In a recent shocking public statement, Lue Elizondo, a former Pentagon official who managed the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), has come forward with disturbing allegations of receiving death threats for his role in advocating for transparency about Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).

Public statement released by former Pentagon official Luis Elizondo outlining background and personal threats related to his work on UAP

Good Trouble Show - May 16, 2024

Public statement released by former Pentagon official Luis Elizondo outlining background and personal threats related to his work on UAP

Good Trouble Show - May 16, 2024

Elizondo is not alone. Other former government officials have also come forward alleging they have faced grave threats for speaking out. This is not just unacceptable; it's illegal.

Let's be crystal clear: threatening the life of a whistleblower is a serious federal crime. It's an attack on the very principles of transparency and accountability that our democracy relies upon. Such alleged crimes demand nothing less than the full attention and swift action of our top law enforcement agencies.

That's why we're calling on the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to immediately open a comprehensive investigation into these alleged death threats. Moreover, we urge the Department of Justice (DOJ) to prosecute those responsible to the fullest extent of the law. Whistleblowers who risk everything to expose the truth and serve the public interest deserve the highest level of protection and support.

The chilling effect of allowing such threats to go unchecked cannot be overstated. It's not just the safety of individuals like Luis Elizondo and David Grusch that's at stake - it's the integrity of our democratic institutions. Without whistleblowers willing to speak truth to power, the very notion of government accountability crumbles.

We cannot allow this to stand. The FBI must act now to investigate these grave allegations, and the DOJ must bring the perpetrators to justice. The American people deserve nothing less than the full truth about UAP, and those who threaten the brave individuals working to uncover it must face the consequences. The time for action is now.

Background on Lue Elizondo and Pentagon UAP Coverup

The allegations made by Luis Elizondo, a former high-ranking Pentagon official with a distinguished career in intelligence and national security, have sent shockwaves through the defense establishment. As the former Director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a secret Pentagon initiative to study UAP encounters, Elizondo brings unparalleled expertise and insider knowledge to the discussion, making his claims all the more credible and concerning.


In 2017, Elizondo made the bold decision to resign from his Pentagon post in protest, driven by a determination to expose the truth about UAP to the American public. His revelations to the New York Times and subsequent statements paint a picture of a Pentagon that had not only been secretly studying UAP for years but had also been engaging in a systematic coverup denying this fact, retaliating against UAP whistleblowers and other federal officials, and misleading both Congress and the public.

In what appears to have been an attempt to deny the existence of AATIP, its involvement in the study of UAP, and/or discredit Elizondo, Pentagon officials initially claimed that all his emails had been deleted, effectively erasing any trace of his connection to the program he brought to light, or any other aspect of his government tenure. If this claim were true, it would potentially constitute a serious violation of a court order related to Elizondo's involvement in the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) case at Guantanamo Bay.


The protective order issued in the KSM case legally requires the retention of all of Elizondo's classified communications and records related to the case, due to his role in that case. Dating back to 2012, the order mandates the preservation of all classified documents or information provided or obtained in connection with the KSM case, unless there is clear indication that the documents have been declassified by the original classification authority.


Furthermore, the same protective order outlines serious consequences for violations of its terms, including disciplinary action, sanctions, contempt charges, or even referral for criminal prosecution.

If the Pentagon did indeed delete all of Elizondo's emails as they claimed, it would be a direct contravention of the KSM case protective order, representing not only a serious breach of military law but also potentially exposing those responsible to severe penalties.

The allegations made by Luis Elizondo, a former high-ranking Pentagon official with a distinguished career in intelligence and national security, have sent shockwaves through the defense establishment. As the former Director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a secret Pentagon initiative to study UAP encounters, Elizondo brings unparalleled expertise and insider knowledge to the discussion, making his claims all the more credible and concerning.


In 2017, Elizondo made the bold decision to resign from his Pentagon post in protest, driven by a determination to expose the truth about UAP to the American public. His revelations to the New York Times and subsequent statements paint a picture of a Pentagon that had not only been secretly studying UAP for years but had also been engaging in a systematic coverup, denying the existence of AATIP and misleading both Congress and the public.

In what appears to have been an attempt to deny the existence of AATIP, its involvement in and discredit Elizondo, Pentagon officials initially claimed that all his emails had been deleted, effectively erasing any trace of the program he brought to light. If this claim were true, it would potentially constitute a serious violation of a court order related to Elizondo's involvement in the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) case at Guantanamo Bay.


The protective order issued in the KSM case legally requires the retention of all of Elizondo's communications and records due to his role in that case. Dating back to 2012, the order mandates the preservation of all classified documents or information provided or obtained in connection with the KSM case, unless there is clear indication that the documents have been declassified by the original classification authority.


Furthermore, the same protective order outlines serious consequences for violations of its terms, including disciplinary action, sanctions, contempt charges, or even referral for criminal prosecution.

If the Pentagon did indeed delete Elizondo's emails as they claim, it would be a direct contravention of the KSM case protective order, representing not only a serious breach of military law but also potentially exposing those responsible to severe penalties.

Redactions differences between the public release of Elizondo’s IG complaint vs. the official FOIA request response to FOIA Case 21-F-1154

The Black Vault - May 13, 2024

Redactions differences between the public release of Elizondo’s IG complaint vs. the official FOIA request response to FOIA Case 21-F-1154

The Black Vault - May 13, 2024

However, some of Elizondo's emails, proving AATIP's existence and his association with the program were, in fact, not deleted. The discovery of these emails was in direct contradiction to the continued denials by the Pentagon of the existence of any such communications at all. This fact pattern underscores the extent of the Pentagon's apparent deception and the lengths they were seemingly willing to go to keep the reality of UAP hidden from public view.

Elizondo's recent statements this past week further underscore the gravity of the situation. By coming forward with his own disturbing experience of receiving death threats, he has shed light on the extreme pressure and intimidation faced by those who are daring to challenge the status quo on UAP.

The Pentagon's alleged actions in this matter raise serious questions about its commitment to adherence to legal obligations. There is an urgent need for a thorough investigation to determine if any federal crimes have been committed and to hold accountable those responsible for any wrongdoing. The American public deserves nothing less than the full truth about UAP and the involvement of the Pentagon, the Intelligence Community (IC), and defense contractors in the study and possible exploitation of this phenomenon.

Federal Laws Being Violated

The allegations made by Lue Elizondo and other UAP whistleblowers not only raise concerns about the Pentagon's transparency and adherence to legal obligations but also point to potential violations of numerous federal laws designed to protect whistleblowers and ensure the integrity of government operations.

18 U.S.C. § 115 makes it a crime to assault, kidnap, murder, attempt to kidnap or murder, or threaten a family member of certain current and former federal officials, or the officials themselves, with intent to impede, intimidate, interfere with, or retaliate against such officials while engaged in or related to the performance of official duties.

The alleged death threats against Elizondo and others, if carried out, could constitute violations of this statute, as they would be intended to intimidate or retaliate against these officials for their work on UAP issues.

18 U.S.C. § 111 prohibits assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees of the United States while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties.

If any physical assaults or forceful interference occurred against officials involved in UAP matters as a result of their work, it would be a direct violation of this law.

18 U.S.C. § 351 provides protections for members of Congress, certain executive officials, Supreme Court Justices, and major presidential or vice presidential candidates, including criminalizing threats to kill, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm on these officials.

Given that UAP issues have gained significant attention from Congress, any threats made against legislators or candidates in relation to their work on this topic could run afoul of this statute.

18 U.S.C. § 1513 addresses retaliation against witnesses, victims, or informants. It makes it a crime to kill, attempt to kill, threaten, or cause bodily injury to any person with intent to retaliate for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any federal offense.

The core of the UAP whistleblowers' allegations is that they faced threats and retaliation for bringing forward information about potential wrongdoing in government UAP programs. If proven, this would be a clear-cut case of witness retaliation prohibited by this law.

The gravity of these potential criminal violations highlight the urgent need for a thorough and impartial federal investigation into the UAP whistleblowers' claims. Threats against life, physical assaults, and retaliation against those who bring alleged government misconduct to light strike at the very heart of our system of laws and accountability.

If substantiated, these allegations would represent a severe erosion of the public trust and a fundamental threat to the integrity of our democratic institutions. It is incumbent upon Congress to exercise its oversight responsibilities and work with law enforcement to uncover the full truth of this matter and ensure that anyone found to have engaged in such illegal acts is held responsible to the fullest extent of the law. The preservation of government accountability and the safety of those who courageously step forward to report wrongdoing depend on a forceful response to these deeply troubling allegations.

Demanding FBI Investigation and DOJ Prosecution

The time for action is now. We cannot allow these grave allegations of death threats against UAP whistleblowers to go uninvestigated. The safety of these brave individuals and the integrity of our democratic institutions hang in the balance.

We demand that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) immediately open or confirm the existence of a comprehensive investigation into the alleged death threats against Lue Elizondo and/or other UAP whistleblowers. No American should face threats to their life for coming forward with information about potential government misconduct.

Moreover, we call upon the Department of Justice (DOJ) to swiftly bring criminal charges against those responsible for making these threats, once they have been identified by the FBI's investigation. The individuals behind these alleged criminal acts must face the full consequences of the law.

To support this call for action, we encourage all concerned citizens to contact their elected representatives and demand they pressure the FBI and DOJ to take immediate action on this matter. Below is a pre-written message you can easily email or tweet to your Senators and Representatives:

"As your constituent, I am deeply disturbed by the recent allegations of death threats against UAP whistleblowers like Lue Elizondo. I urge you to use your office to demand that the FBI immediately investigate these threats and the DOJ prosecute those responsible to the fullest extent of the law. The safety of whistleblowers and the accountability of our government are at stake."

You can find the contact information for your representatives at: congress.gov/members.
For those overseeing the relevant agencies, you can contact:

In addition to individual actions, we have also created an online petition at [Insert Link] for the public to collectively voice their demand for an FBI investigation and DOJ prosecution. Please add your name to show your support and share widely on social media with the hashtag #ProtectUAPWhistleblowers.

This petition has already garnered the support of notable public figures, thought leaders, and organizations such as:

  • [Insert list/signatures of VIPs, influencers, and organizations voicing support]

Their backing underscores the widespread concern over these allegations and the urgent need for action.

The U.S. government has a solemn duty to protect whistleblowers and to investigate and prosecute those who would threaten them. We must not allow these alleged crimes to be swept under the rug. The stakes are too high.

This website (uapcaucus.com) is an independent community-driven platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or representative of any official government entity, including the UAP Caucus within the House of Representatives, or any other official body. The views, frameworks, and content expressed on this site are those of the contributors and do not reflect the official stance or endorsement of any governmental organization.

This website (uapcaucus.com) is an independent community-driven platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or representative of any official government entity, including the UAP Caucus within the House of Representatives, or any other official body. The views, frameworks, and content expressed on this site are those of the contributors and do not reflect the official stance or endorsement of any governmental organization.

This website (uapcaucus.com) is an independent community-driven platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or representative of any official government entity, including the UAP Caucus within the House of Representatives, or any other official body. The views, frameworks, and content expressed on this site are those of the contributors and do not reflect the official stance or endorsement of any governmental organization.